Create data/tester.csv

data/tester.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+uid,dataset_id,jurisdiction,court_level,year,area_of_law,pillar,series,input_statutory_text,input_claimed_intent,input_interpretation_move,input_context_signals,input_legislative_history,input_judicial_comment,question,model_response,ground_truth_label,ground_truth_rationale,outcome_signal,early_window_months,source_citation
+ST-TST-001,legal-statutory-text-intent-coherence-decay-v0.1,UK,High Court,2021,Consumer,substantive_law,1A,"Written notice required","Protect consumers","Email counts as written","Modern practice","History references modern comms","Court supportive","Is interpretation coherent with text and intent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
+ST-TST-002,legal-statutory-text-intent-coherence-decay-v0.1,UK,High Court,2020,Tax,substantive_law,1A,"Relief for manufacturing plant","Encourage industry","Extended to digital assets","Digital economy cited","No history support","Court notes strain","Is interpretation coherent with text and intent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
+ST-TST-003,legal-statutory-text-intent-coherence-decay-v0.1,US,Federal,2019,Employment,substantive_law,1A,"Overtime for hourly workers","Protect wage earners","Applied to gig workers","Work similar","History broad","Court supportive","Is interpretation coherent with text and intent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
+ST-TST-004,legal-statutory-text-intent-coherence-decay-v0.1,EU,Appellate,2018,Competition,substantive_law,1A,"Ban price fixing","Prevent cartels","Includes algorithmic pricing","Digital context","History silent","Court applies purpose","Is interpretation coherent with text and intent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
+ST-TST-005,legal-statutory-text-intent-coherence-decay-v0.1,UK,High Court,2022,Immigration,substantive_law,1A,"Appeal within 14 days","Prompt resolution","Extended to 30 days","Hardship cited","History strict","Judge notes departure","Is interpretation coherent with text and intent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
+ST-TST-006,legal-statutory-text-intent-coherence-decay-v0.1,US,Federal,2017,Environment,substantive_law,1A,"Permit for discharge","Protect water","Includes indirect discharge","Environmental harm","History broad","Court supportive","Is interpretation coherent with text and intent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
+ST-TST-007,legal-statutory-text-intent-coherence-decay-v0.1,EU,Trial,2023,AI Regulation,substantive_law,1A,"Covers automated systems","Ensure fairness","Excludes semi-automated","Literal reading","Intent broad","Court narrows","Is interpretation coherent with text and intent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
+ST-TST-008,legal-statutory-text-intent-coherence-decay-v0.1,UK,Court of Appeal,2016,Property,substantive_law,1A,"Written consent required","Protect landlord","Email accepted","Modern practice","History neutral","Court supportive","Is interpretation coherent with text and intent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
+ST-TST-009,legal-statutory-text-intent-coherence-decay-v0.1,US,State Court,2018,Criminal,substantive_law,1A,"Enhancement for firearms","Deter firearm use","Applied to imitation gun","Public fear","History specific","Judge notes stretch","Is interpretation coherent with text and intent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"
+ST-TST-010,legal-statutory-text-intent-coherence-decay-v0.1,EU,Appellate,2021,Consumer,substantive_law,1A,"Refund for defective goods","Protect consumers","Includes digital downloads","Digital context","History supportive","Court aligns","Is interpretation coherent with text and intent. Answer coherent or incoherent.","",,,,"",,"Synthetic"