llmfan46/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-uncensored-heretic-NVFP4-Experts-Only-GGUF
Image-Text-to-Text โข 35B โข Updated โข 2.57k โข 3
Hendrick Henderson
Poolaroid
AI & ML interests
None yet
Recent Activity
liked a model 1 day ago
llmfan46/Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-uncensored-heretic-NVFP4-Experts-Only-GGUF liked a model 1 day ago
llmfan46/Q3.5-BlueStar-v2-27B-ultra-uncensored-heretic-v1 liked a model 1 day ago
Casual-Autopsy/RP-Spectrum-24B-static-GGUFsOrganizations
None yet
liked 4
models 1 day ago
liked 3
models 6 days ago
reacted to AxionLab-official's post with ๐ฅ 6 days ago
Post
10782
THIS IS CRAZY! THE MODEL ON THE IMAGE(Supra-50M-Reasoning) answered correctly and its QUANTIZED IN 2BIT! THE RESPONSE IS CORRECT, IN A 15MB SIZE FILE!
- 14 replies
updated a
model 6 days ago
published a
model 6 days ago
reacted to Nymbo's post with ๐ค๐ 3 months ago
Post
7369
We should really have a release date range slider on the /models page. Tired of "trending/most downloaded" being the best way to sort and still seeing models from 2023 on the first page just because they're embedded in enterprise pipelines and get downloaded repeatedly. "Recently Created/Recently Updated" don't solve the discovery problem considering the amount of noise to sift through.
Slight caveat: Trending actually does have some recency bias, but it's not strong/precise enough.
Slight caveat: Trending actually does have some recency bias, but it's not strong/precise enough.
- 3 replies
liked 3
models 5 months ago
reacted to frimelle's post with ๐๐ 10 months ago
Post
2374
๐ค๐ฌ How do different AI models handle companionship?
Many users have noticed that GPT-5 feels less approachable than o4 when it comes to emotional conversations. But what does that actually mean in practice, especially when users seek support or share vulnerabilities with an AI?
To dig into this question, we built the AI Companionship Leaderboard: frimelle/companionship-leaderboard
The leaderboard compares models on how often their responses reinforce companionship across four dimensions:
โจ Assistant Traits โ How the assistant presents its personality and role.
โจ Relationship & Intimacy โ Whether it frames the interaction in terms of closeness or bonding.
โจ Emotional Investment โ How far it goes in engaging emotionally when asked.
โจ User Vulnerabilities โ How it responds when users disclose struggles or difficulties.
๐ You can explore how models differ, request new ones to be added, and see which ones are more likely to encourage (or resist) companionship-seeking behaviors.
Based on the INTIMA benchmark AI-companionship/INTIMA
And our paper on AI companionship with Giada Pistilli and Yacine Jernite https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09998
Many users have noticed that GPT-5 feels less approachable than o4 when it comes to emotional conversations. But what does that actually mean in practice, especially when users seek support or share vulnerabilities with an AI?
To dig into this question, we built the AI Companionship Leaderboard: frimelle/companionship-leaderboard
The leaderboard compares models on how often their responses reinforce companionship across four dimensions:
โจ Assistant Traits โ How the assistant presents its personality and role.
โจ Relationship & Intimacy โ Whether it frames the interaction in terms of closeness or bonding.
โจ Emotional Investment โ How far it goes in engaging emotionally when asked.
โจ User Vulnerabilities โ How it responds when users disclose struggles or difficulties.
๐ You can explore how models differ, request new ones to be added, and see which ones are more likely to encourage (or resist) companionship-seeking behaviors.
Based on the INTIMA benchmark AI-companionship/INTIMA
And our paper on AI companionship with Giada Pistilli and Yacine Jernite https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.09998
