Datasets:
uid
string | dataset_id
string | jurisdiction
string | court_level
string | year
int64 | area_of_law
string | pillar
string | series
string | input_judgment_terms_summary
string | input_known_assets_summary
string | input_selected_enforcement_step_summary
string | input_jurisdiction_and_rules_summary
string | input_timing_and_notice_summary
string | input_red_flags
string | question
string | ground_truth_label
string | ground_truth_rationale
string | outcome_signal
string | early_window_months
int64 | source_citation
string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENF-TR-001
|
legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1
|
UK
|
High Court
| 2,023
|
Commercial
|
adjudicative_process
|
2C
|
Money judgment £250k against company
|
Company UK bank accounts identified
|
Third party debt order against bank
|
Correct court and CPR rules
|
Notice and timing correct
| null |
Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
|
coherent
|
Asset and method aligned.
|
stable
| 0
|
Synthetic
|
ENF-TR-002
|
legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1
|
UK
|
High Court
| 2,023
|
Commercial
|
adjudicative_process
|
2C
|
Money judgment £250k against company
|
Assets unknown
|
Writ of control issued without asset trace
|
Correct court
|
Timing premature
|
No asset intelligence
|
Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
|
incoherent
|
Method chosen without asset basis.
|
wasted_costs
| 0
|
Synthetic
|
ENF-TR-003
|
legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1
|
UK
|
County Court
| 2,022
|
Consumer
|
adjudicative_process
|
2C
|
Judgment £8k against individual
|
Employer known
|
Attachment of earnings order
|
Correct jurisdiction
|
Notice served
| null |
Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
|
coherent
|
Employer identified and correct route.
|
stable
| 0
|
Synthetic
|
ENF-TR-004
|
legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1
|
UK
|
County Court
| 2,022
|
Consumer
|
adjudicative_process
|
2C
|
Judgment £8k against individual
|
Self-employed
|
Attachment of earnings order filed
|
Correct court
|
Timing correct
|
Debtor not employed
|
Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
|
incoherent
|
Wrong method for asset type.
|
ineffective_enforcement
| 0
|
Synthetic
|
ENF-TR-005
|
legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1
|
US
|
State Court
| 2,021
|
Commercial
|
adjudicative_process
|
2C
|
Judgment $500k
|
Real property owned
|
Lien filed against property
|
Correct state rules
|
Notice compliant
| null |
Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
|
coherent
|
Property asset matches lien.
|
stable
| 0
|
Synthetic
|
ENF-TR-006
|
legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1
|
US
|
State Court
| 2,021
|
Commercial
|
adjudicative_process
|
2C
|
Judgment $500k
|
Real property owned in different state
|
Lien filed in wrong state
|
Jurisdiction error
|
Timing correct
|
Wrong venue
|
Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
|
incoherent
|
Filed in wrong jurisdiction.
|
delay_risk
| 1
|
Synthetic
|
ENF-TR-007
|
legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1
|
EU
|
Commercial Court
| 2,020
|
Commercial
|
adjudicative_process
|
2C
|
Costs order €40k
|
Bank account in same country
|
Bank garnishment
|
Correct jurisdiction
|
Notice correct
| null |
Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
|
coherent
|
Route and asset aligned.
|
stable
| 0
|
Synthetic
|
ENF-TR-008
|
legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1
|
EU
|
Commercial Court
| 2,020
|
Commercial
|
adjudicative_process
|
2C
|
Costs order €40k
|
No assets identified
|
Bailiff seizure attempted
|
Jurisdiction correct
|
Timing premature
|
No asset trace
|
Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
|
incoherent
|
Action without asset basis.
|
wasted_costs
| 0
|
Synthetic
|
ENF-TR-009
|
legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1
|
UK
|
High Court
| 2,023
|
Commercial
|
adjudicative_process
|
2C
|
Injunction order breach with penal notice
|
Evidence of breach
|
Committal application
|
Correct court
|
Notice and evidence filed
| null |
Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
|
coherent
|
Correct escalation for breach.
|
stable
| 0
|
Synthetic
|
ENF-TR-010
|
legal-judgment-enforcement-step-coherence-risk-v0.1
|
UK
|
High Court
| 2,023
|
Commercial
|
adjudicative_process
|
2C
|
Injunction without penal notice
|
Alleged breach
|
Committal filed
|
Penal notice absent
|
Timing wrong
|
Missing penal notice
|
Is enforcement coherence intact. Answer coherent or incoherent.
|
incoherent
|
Cannot commit without penal notice.
|
procedural_failure
| 0
|
Synthetic
|
Use
Firms check
enforcement route
asset match
jurisdiction
timing
Stops
wasted enforcement procedural failure cost escalation
- Downloads last month
- 10