Spaces:
Paused
Paused
A newer version of the Gradio SDK is available:
6.1.0
Update Summary: Using LM Student in Comparison
β Changes Completed
Updated compare_strategies.py to use LM Student (DistilBERT) instead of MockStudentAgent for all three strategies:
- Random Strategy - Now uses LM Student
- Progressive Strategy - Now uses LM Student
- Teacher Strategy - Now uses LM Student
π§ Technical Changes
1. Added LM Student Import
- Added path to
student_agent_devdirectory - Imports
StudentAgentfromstudent_agent.pyasLMStudentAgent - Falls back to
MockStudentAgentif import fails
2. Updated All Three Strategy Functions
train_strategy_random()- Uses LM Studenttrain_strategy_progressive()- Uses LM Studenttrain_strategy_teacher()- Uses LM Student
3. LM Student Configuration
All strategies use:
student = LMStudentAgent(
learning_rate=5e-5, # LM fine-tuning learning rate
retention_constant=80.0, # Slower forgetting
device='cpu', # CPU for compatibility
max_length=256, # Max tokens
gradient_accumulation_steps=4 # Stability
)
4. Fallback Support
If LM Student cannot be imported, automatically falls back to MockStudentAgent.
π How to Run
cd teacher_agent_dev
# Quick test (50 iterations)
python compare_strategies.py --iterations 50 --deterministic
# Full comparison (500 iterations - will take longer with LM)
python compare_strategies.py --iterations 500 --deterministic
β οΈ Performance Notes
LM Student is much slower than MockStudentAgent because:
- Each
answer()call runs DistilBERT inference - Each
learn()call fine-tunes DistilBERT (forward + backward pass) - Memory decay calculations
Expected runtime:
- MockStudentAgent: ~30 seconds for 500 iterations
- LM Student: ~15-30 minutes for 500 iterations
π What to Expect
With LM Student:
- More realistic learning: Actual neural network learning vs simple skill tracking
- Slower convergence: LM needs more examples to learn patterns
- Different results: LM behavior differs from mock student
- Memory decay: Ebbinghaus forgetting curve affects LM predictions
β Verification
The code is ready to run. When you execute:
- You'll see:
β Using LM Student (DistilBERT)if import succeeds - Or:
β οΈ Could not import LM Studentif transformers library missing - All three strategies will use the same student type
π Next Steps
Run the comparison and analyze results:
- Do teacher strategy still outperform random/progressive?
- How does LM learning differ from mock student?
- What patterns emerge with real neural network learning?