MentorFlow / teacher_agent_dev /UPDATE_SUMMARY.md
Cornelius
Deploy MentorFlow with GPU support
a52f96d

A newer version of the Gradio SDK is available: 6.1.0

Upgrade

Update Summary: Using LM Student in Comparison

βœ… Changes Completed

Updated compare_strategies.py to use LM Student (DistilBERT) instead of MockStudentAgent for all three strategies:

  1. Random Strategy - Now uses LM Student
  2. Progressive Strategy - Now uses LM Student
  3. Teacher Strategy - Now uses LM Student

πŸ”§ Technical Changes

1. Added LM Student Import

  • Added path to student_agent_dev directory
  • Imports StudentAgent from student_agent.py as LMStudentAgent
  • Falls back to MockStudentAgent if import fails

2. Updated All Three Strategy Functions

  • train_strategy_random() - Uses LM Student
  • train_strategy_progressive() - Uses LM Student
  • train_strategy_teacher() - Uses LM Student

3. LM Student Configuration

All strategies use:

student = LMStudentAgent(
    learning_rate=5e-5,           # LM fine-tuning learning rate
    retention_constant=80.0,      # Slower forgetting
    device='cpu',                 # CPU for compatibility
    max_length=256,               # Max tokens
    gradient_accumulation_steps=4 # Stability
)

4. Fallback Support

If LM Student cannot be imported, automatically falls back to MockStudentAgent.

πŸ“ How to Run

cd teacher_agent_dev

# Quick test (50 iterations)
python compare_strategies.py --iterations 50 --deterministic

# Full comparison (500 iterations - will take longer with LM)
python compare_strategies.py --iterations 500 --deterministic

⚠️ Performance Notes

LM Student is much slower than MockStudentAgent because:

  • Each answer() call runs DistilBERT inference
  • Each learn() call fine-tunes DistilBERT (forward + backward pass)
  • Memory decay calculations

Expected runtime:

  • MockStudentAgent: ~30 seconds for 500 iterations
  • LM Student: ~15-30 minutes for 500 iterations

πŸ” What to Expect

With LM Student:

  • More realistic learning: Actual neural network learning vs simple skill tracking
  • Slower convergence: LM needs more examples to learn patterns
  • Different results: LM behavior differs from mock student
  • Memory decay: Ebbinghaus forgetting curve affects LM predictions

βœ… Verification

The code is ready to run. When you execute:

  1. You'll see: βœ… Using LM Student (DistilBERT) if import succeeds
  2. Or: ⚠️ Could not import LM Student if transformers library missing
  3. All three strategies will use the same student type

πŸš€ Next Steps

Run the comparison and analyze results:

  • Do teacher strategy still outperform random/progressive?
  • How does LM learning differ from mock student?
  • What patterns emerge with real neural network learning?